Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Consider getting "over-the-top" television content



What is "over-the-top" television? According to Wikipedia, "over-the-top" content "refers to delivery of audio, video, and other media over the Internet without a multiple system operator being involved in the control or distribution of the content."

I unplugged from satellite television several years ago and now, except for Netflix, pay no monthly fees for television viewing. There are several ways to do this, but I will limit this article to how our family did it.

We bought a Roku streaming player when they first came out several years ago. We now have three Rokus in our home for each television. The Roku works in conjunction with your high-speed Internet connection to make it possible to watch Internet content on your television screen in your living room or bedroom instead of watching it on a smaller computer monitor.

Once you have installed the Roku unit, you'll have access to dozens of channels offered through Roku. As a political news junkie, I can watch C-SPAN and Newsmax TV live. If you haven't checked out Newsmax TV, please give it a try. "America's Forum" with J.D. Hayworth, "MidPoint," and "The Steve Malzberg Show" are outstanding programming and unabashedly conservative. I would also recommend the "America's Survival" channel, which makes a compelling argument that Fox News has moved further to the left during the past few years in what is an apparent case of "O'Sullivan's Law."

In addition to using Roku, I have downloaded software from PlayOn. The software costs $59.99, but that is a one-time fee. We have been using PlayOn for over two years now. PlayOn allows you to view news, sports, and entertainment from around the world. Programming for many cable networks is available either directly through those networks or a third party such as Hulu, although you may have to wait a day or two before you can watch it.  For example, I'm a fan of "Longmire," which is aired on A&E. I can't watch it live since I don't have cable or satellite service. However, I can watch it the next day through Hulu. 

PlayOn also includes a feature called "PlayMark." Using PlayMark, you can "mark" just about any video from any website for watching later on your TV. I use this to "mark" documentaries and other videos available on YouTube. For political junkies, there's a large number of great videos available on YouTube, but it's a bit of a pain to sit at a computer to watch them. Roku and PlayOn make it possible to watch them on your television.

As I noted above, there are other ways to watch "over-the-top" content. This is how I do it, but a different way may be better for you. For more information about Roku and "over-the-top" content, please view this video (if you watch it on your computer monitor, imagine how nice it would be to watch it on your television instead):



Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Kansas City Star lifts language from a 1960s playbook



In the August 19 issue of the Kansas City Star columnist Dave Helling took Fox News' Sean Hannity to task on page A4:

A generation ago, that reaction would have been predictable: Conservatives would have backed the police, no questions asked. Indeed, we saw some of that last week, when Fox News host Sean Hannity worried about "outside agitators" in Ferguson and the New Black Panther Party, language clearly lifted from a 1960s playbook.

Apparently, Helling didn't get a chance to read all of the August 19 issue of his newspaper prior to writing his column. If he had, he would have noticed this headline on the front page: "'Outside agitators' stoke residents' ire." "The people causing all the trouble, they aren't from Ferguson," said resident Mike Marion, 26, in the article.

As far as the New Black Panther Party, they have indeed been in Ferguson, and even took over the police chief's press conference.

Helling then went on to suggest that Hannity is a hypocrite because he allegedly took a different position regarding the Clive Bundy case in April than he is regarding the protesters in Ferguson:
In April, when rancher Clive Bundy battled federal officials in Nevada, the pundit said: "I'm just afraid of what this government is capable of doing. ... We saw what happened in Waco." 
As far as I can determine, Hannity has yet to link authorities in Ferguson with those in 1993 in Texas. 
That kind of double-talk [sic] seems more and more like old news.
Of course, it would be difficult to link authorities in Ferguson with those in Waco for one very obvious reason: The authorities in Ferguson are local authorities, while the authorities in Waco and Utah were federal authorities. When Hannity said "this government," he was clearly referring to the federal government.




Saturday, August 16, 2014

Who is Dan Watkins and the Kansas Values Institute?


The Kansas Values Institute (KVI) has been attacking the record of Gov. Sam Brownback, a Republican. The chair of KVI is Dan Watkins, an attorney from Lawrence. Helen VanEtten, Topeka, a national committeewoman for Kansas Republican Party, has done a great job of outlining Watkins' longtime connections to the Democratic Party. Kansas Meadowlark has also done an outstanding job of reporting on where KVI gets its money and with whom it spends it. However, liberals and moderates who are cheering on KVI might want to consider Watkins' business dealings in Douglas County.

Many liberals and moderates opposed the construction of the South Lawrence Trafficway (SLT). Few, however, know of Watkins' role in the SLT, which goes back to the 1980s. The Pitch, an alternative newspaper based in Kansas City, did extensive reporting on the SLT and Watkins in 1997. According to The Pitch:
Watkins served as chief counsel for the Kansas Dept. of Transportation from 1980 to 1984. He says he worked with County Commissioner Nancy Hiebert, KDOT planning director Michael O'Keefe and members of the Kansas Turnpike Authority to "look at transportation-related problems and possible solutions" before the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce ever got involved. But Watkins' name also appears on the trafficway proposal that came out of the secret Chamber of Commerce planning meetings.
Further:
In August 1985, when the Douglas County Commission sought engineering firms for a preliminary study of the highway, commissioners were impressed with HNTB's bells and whistles. "Describing the firm's presentation, which she said included color-coded charts and an '8-foot-long' visual aid, Hiebert said she has 'never seen a presentation up to that level,'" according to the Journal-World. HNTB won out over eight other firms, though none of the firms had submitted bids. The county paid HNTB $148,500 for the preliminary study.

When HNTB returned several months later with its results, the presenters included Daniel J. Watkins, a managing partner in the firm and the father of Dan Watkins. The elder Watkins later retired from HNTB, but not before the firm had secured much of the county's trafficway business. Some argue that the family connection was a bit too close.

"No one says that very loud," says Dan Watkins. "HNTB was selected for every major road project in the state of Kansas. They designed the Kansas Turnpike and many turnpikes around the country. They were a firm well positioned to design limited access roadways when the federal interstate system was funded in the '50s and '60s. They're one of the largest design firms in the country. My dad is a well-recognized, well-respected engineer. The fact that he's my father doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with anything."
Many liberals and moderates also opposed Columbia/HCA's proposal to build a second hospital in Lawrence. Watkins also played a major role in that controversy proposal, as did Hiebert and another lawyer turned judge named Paula Martin.

In 1994, Martin was part of a 19-member pool of Douglas County attorneys hoping to be appointed to a new judgeship. Amongst the seven-member judicial nominating committee was Nancy Hiebert, a former Douglas County commissioner. Two years before then, Hiebert had been appointed to the Commission on Judicial Qualifications, which is the state's watchdog agency for municipal and district judges.

At the time that Martin was being considered for the new judgeship, the 1994 Polk's Lawrence City Directory shows her office was located at 211 E. 8th St., Ste. C, in Lawrence. The directory also listed attorney Dan Watkins' office at the very same address.

After the pool of 19 had been pared down to three, the governor appointed Martin to fill the new judgeship. (Dan Watkins has worked for and with several Kansas governors. I have heard, but could not confirm, that he lobbied Gov. Joan Finney to appoint Martin to the judgeship.)

That same year, Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp began expressing an interest in doing business in Lawrence. The corporation hired Hiebert as a liaison between the corporation and City of Lawrence officials. By early 1995, Columbia/HCA had proposed to buy half of Lawrence Memorial Hospital. Dan Watkins, a Lawrence attorney working on the Columbia/HCA proposal, "estimated that $28 million in cash would be generated by the creation of the joint venture." Hiebert appeared with Watkins when he presented the proposal to Douglas County commissioners. In June 1996 Hiebert was promoted to serve as acting chief operating officer of Mt. Oread Medical Arts Centre, which was owned by Columbia/HCA. Like Watkins, Hiebert is deeply involved in Democratic Party politics. In fact, she and her husband John hosted Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, at their home in 2005. At aht event, Dean told the crowd, "This is a struggle of good and evil. And we're the good."

After LMH trustees rejected Columbia/HCA's proposal to buy LMH, Columbia/HCA announced its intentions to build a for-profit hospital in Lawrence to compete with city-owned LMH.

In December 1996, Lawrence city commissioners unanimously rejected Columbia/HCA's proposal to build a new, for-profit hospital in Lawrence. According to the Journal-World, "Columbia's local attorney, Dan Watkins, cautioned commissioners that governments aren't always granted immunity from antitrust laws, particularly when the city, which owns the hospital, is a 'market participant.'"

In February 1997, Columbia/HCA filed a lawsuit against the City of Lawrence, saying "The city commission had no reason to deny Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. its request to build a hospital in Lawrence." (Hiebert left her position as acting chief operating officer of Mt. Oread Medical Arts Centre prior to the filing of the lawsuit.)

In July 1997, three executives of Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. were indicted by a federal grand jury in Florida on charges of defrauding the government for over a decade. They're charged with conspiring to overbill Medicare and Medicaid by more than $1.7 million. Richard Scott, chairman and chief executive of the corporation, was forced to resign. In August 1997, the trustee for the New York state public pension fund sued 11 current and former executives and directors of Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., saying that they had allowed "pervasive and systemic" criminal fraud to flourish throughout the company. In January 2001, two subsidiaries of The Healthcare Corp., formerly Columbia/HCA, pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges and were fined $65.2 million.

Back in Lawrence, Columbia/HCA's lawsuit against the city was given to Judge Paula Martin to rule on. In May 1998, Judge Martin ruled in favor of Columbia/HCA, saying that the city's permit rejection was "unreasonable.'' The city responded with an appeal.

In February 2000, months after Columbia/HCA had sold its Mt. Oread complex to LMH, the Kansas Court of Appeals overturned Judge Martin's ruling, and for one simple reason, which the judge apparently overlooked: Columbia/HCA did not own the property involved, so the question of whether it should be allowed to proceed with a new hospital was moot.

I will leave it to the reader to judge for herself or himself whether Watkins' roles with the SLT and Columbia/HCA represent "Kansas values."
 

Saturday, August 9, 2014

Bird Watching: On the lookout for a conflict of interest


Burdett A. "Bird" Loomis, a professor of political science at the University of Kansas, penned an opinion piece for the Wichita Eagle on November 20, 2012 with the headline "Brownback’s goals are costing Kansans." Loomis ended his piece with this: "In the end, we’re not going bye-bye, nor are we the worst state in the nation. But that’s how we’re trending. It’s bad news for Brownback, and even worse news for Kansans who must suffer the unintended consequences of the governor’s quixotic bid for the presidency."

Of course, Loomis served as the director of administrative services for Governor Kathleen Sebelius (who went on to deliver bad news for most Americans in the form of Obamacare), so no one should expect Loomis to support Brownback's policies. However, note that Loomis' piece was published just months after his son, Dakota, was named communications director of the Kansas Democratic Party.

In the past Prof. Loomis has been asked by various media in Kansas and beyond to offer his analysis on politics in Kansas. Given his son's position with KDP, this is an obvious conflict of interest. If you see any examples of Prof. Loomis offering such analysis prior to the general election in November, please contact Douglas County Conservative at dococonservative@gmail.com.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Peter Hancock gets the facts wrong--again


Liberal activist Peter Hancock of the Lawrence Journal-World reported on the GOP gubernatorial primary election shortly after it was clear that Gov. Brownback had won the election. According to Hancock, Brownback won despite a "surprisingly strong showing by a virtual unknown in politics." In the same article, Hancock noted that "Secretary of State Kris Kobach handily won his GOP primary." Note that Brownback won over Winn 63% to 37%. Kobach won over Scott Morgan 65% to 35%. Apparently, Hancock believes the difference between winning "handily" and facing a "surprising strong showing" from an opponent is two percentage points.

Not content with reporting on just the election results, Hancock continued with this tidbit: "Brownback's primary win came on the same day that a new Gallup poll showed Kansas is the only state in the nation to see an increase in the number of uninsured residents since enactment of the federal health insurance law, commonly known as Obamacare." Hancock provided a link to a Kansas City Star article about the poll, but he obviously failed to read that article. If he had, he would have noticed the headline: "Kansas is the only state to see a significant increase in its uninsured rate, survey says." (My emphasis) Hancock dropped the word "significant" from his reporting. If you check out the actual Gallup poll, you'll find that two other states--Iowa and Virginia--also saw increases in their uninsured rates.

Hancock also failed to include a qualification from Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who supports Obamacare. According to Praeger in the Star's article, the number “appears to be an anomaly that needs more review. To have the uninsured jump that much in one year would be unprecedented.” Praeger added, “We will try to find out where the discrepancy is.”

According to the Star, Dan Witters, research director for the Well-Being Index, "did not offer an explanation for the growth in the uninsured population in Kansas. However, Kansas is among the states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs to cover more people with low incomes, an option through the Affordable Care Act."

That is true. However, 21 states that also did not expand their Medicaid programs saw decreases in their uninsured rates.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article1093005.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article1093005.html#storylink=cpy