Monday, May 26, 2014

Chairman of CAIR-Kansas compares former Marine to KKK member and neo-Nazi



Just before Memorial Day, a day on which Americans honor veterans who served and died for their country, Moussa Elbayoumy, the Lawrence-based chairman of Kansas chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), attacked a former Marine.

John Guandolo, the former Marine officer, is also a former FBI agent, counter-terrorism expert, and the founder of Understanding the Threat, an organization dedicated to providing threat-focused strategic and operational consultation, education, and training for federal, state and local leadership and agencies.

Guandolo was scheduled to train the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s Office this week on how to ID terrorism threats. However, the seminar was cancelled after CAIR, an Islamofascist group that has had ties to Hamas, protested. The U.S. government has designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. In 2007, CAIR was named, along with 245 others, by U.S. Federal prosecutors in a list of unindicted co-conspirators and/or joint venturers in a Hamas funding case involving the Holy Land Foundation. In 2009, the FBI cut its ties to CAIR because of its relationship with Hamas.

According to Elbayoumy, "bringing [Guandolo] in would be like bringing a member of the KKK to teach about African-American culture or a neo-Nazi to teach about Jewish culture."

So a representative of a group that was named a co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case likens a former U.S. Marine and FBI agent to a KKK member or neo-Nazi? That takes a great deal of chutzpah on Elbayoumy's part, especially when you consider that his group is much, much closer to KKK and neo-Nazi ideologies.

"Other Muslims in the community who complained to the Sedgwick Sheriff's office were leaders and spokesmen from the local Muslim Students Associations (the first Muslim Brotherhood organization established in America in 1963) and the Islamic Society of Wichita - a Muslim Brotherhood organization and a subsidiary of the Islamic Society of North America which is the largest MB organization here and a financial support entity for Hamas per the evidence at the HLF trial," Guandolo noted on his blog.

"So, by canceling this training in Kansas, the Sedgwick County Sheriff has not only emboldened our enemy - namely the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas - he has ensured that local law enforcement will NOT get the very training they need to protect and defend their communities," Guandolo added.

Shame of the Sedgwick County sheriff for caving into the Islamofascists. Guandolo's fellow Marines went to Iraq and Afghanistan to fight the Islamofascists there so we wouldn't have to fight them here. The sheriff's decision makes it more likely that we will have to fight them here in the future.



Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/21/3467720/national-islamic-group-asks-sedgwick.html#storylink=cpy




John Guandolo

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Scott Morgan calls Kris Kobach a "bully"


Scott Morgan of Lawrence announced this week that he would take on Secretary of State Kris Kobach in this August's GOP primary. According to the Lawrence-Journal-World, "Morgan said Kobach wasn't serving the office or Kansas residents by pursuing his agenda. He cited new state laws for voter registration that Morgan said suggested Republicans were afraid to allow new voters in the system and competition.

"This is not who we are as Kansans or Republicans," Morgan said. "Frankly, [Kobach]'s become a bully."

Kobach, of course, was puzzled by Morgan's characterization of him as a bully. One issue that Kobach has been criticized for is his opposition to illegal immigration. But since when is wanting to enforce the laws of our country the behavior of a bully? My wife’s mother came to the U.S. in 1993 and soon after petitioned for my wife's older sister to come here. She finally arrived in the U.S. in 2010. She had to wait well over a decade, pay fees, travel to the U.S. embassy in Manila for interviews, and then do some more waiting. She also had to provide an affidavit of support to ensure that she would not become a ward of the state.

While my sister-in-law was waiting to come to the U.S. legally, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants essentially cut in line before her.Now, I don't know about you, but when I was in grade school it was the kids who cut into line who were the bullies, and not the teachers who made them do the right thing and go to the end of the line to wait their turn.

Is Kobach a bully when it comes to wanting voters to present a photo ID before being allowed to vote? The Washington Post has reported that "Almost three-quarters of all Americans support the idea that people should have to show photo identification to vote." Would Morgan consider all of these Americans to be bullies. South Africa requires photo identificaion to vote. Are that country's leaders bullies?

Morgan apparently is confused concerning how bullies act. Here's a good example of actual bullying:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2010/05/21/As-SEIU-Terrorizes-Bank-Employee---s-Son--HuffPo-and-MediaMatters-Omit-Deadbeat-Union---s--90-Million-Debt

Here's another example. This was done by a Kansas group that is an affiliate of the national group mentioned in my first link on bullying:

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/immigration-activists-mob-kansas-secretary-of-states-home.html

Friday, May 23, 2014

Margie Wakefield begins race with "extremist" smear


Margie Wakefield, a Lawrence attorney, announced yesterday that she will be a Democratic Party candidate to challenge GOP Rep. Lynn Jenkins for the Kansas Second District congressional seat. Demonstrating that she will be more of a name-caller than a problem-solver, Wakefield told the audience, "Kansas will lead the country this year in a backlash against the extremists and obstructionists that hold elected office now."

Liberals/progressives/socialists have been using the "extremist" smear against conservatives for many decades now. Sometimes it works, such as when Democrat Dennis Moore used it against Republican Vince Snowbarger in the 3rd District race in 1998. Moore won that race, but then went on the be named a "Liberal Hero" by Americans for Democratic Action, the largest liberal lobbying organization in the U.S., in 1999.

More often than not, the "extremist" smear does not work in Kansas, and for good reason: Members of Wakefield's party are the ones out of the mainstream in Kansas. That Wakefield would use the term suggests that she is being directed by advisers in D.C. and really doesn't have any original ideas of her own.

In her essay "'Extremism' or the Art of Smearing," Ayn Rand characterized the "extremist" smear as an "anti-concept." According to Rand, "The purpose of 'anti-concepts' is to obliterate certain concepts without public discussion; and, as a means to that end, to make public discussion unintelligible, and to induce the same disintegration in the mind of any man who accepts them, rendering him incapable of clear thinking or rational judgment. No mind is better than the precision of its concepts." Further, "If an uncompromising stand is to be smeared as 'extremism,' then that smear is directed at any devotion to values, any loyalty to principles, any profound conviction, any consistency, any steadfastness, any passion, any dedication to an unbreached, inviolate truth—any man of integrity."

Keep that in mind as Wakefield continues with the "extremist" nonsense.

Also, keep in mind that Wakefield hopes to join a Democratic Party caucus in D.C. that has 80 members who belong to the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC).  CPC was founded by socialist Bernie Sanders and five other members of the U.S. House in 1991. Another founder was Rep. Ron Dellums (D-CA), who was also a member of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). In fact, DSA helped set up CPC and describes CPC as the "socialist caucus in Congress." According to DSA's website, "Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community organizing movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party. We work with those movements to strengthen the party’s left wing, represented by the Congressional Progressive Caucus."

DSA is an affiliate of the Socialist International, which, according to Michael Harrington, the chairman of DSA until his death in 1989, claims "direct descent from Marx’s International Workingmen’s Association." Other affiliates of the Socialist International include the Sandinista National Liberation Front of Nicaragua and Fatah, the Palestinian political party that was classified as a terrorist organization by the United States Department of State and United States Congress until it renounced terrorism in 1988.

As the late Balint Vazsonyi, who first exposed that CPC’s official webpage was originally hosted on DSA’s website during the late 1990s, noted in 2002, "every single tenet of the Socialist International is the exact opposite of the principles upon which America was founded, and which define the U.S. Constitution." That’s the same Constitution CPC members took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend.

Lynn Jenkins is no extremist. If Wakefield wants to see true extremists, she should take a good look at the members of her party in D.C.

- For more information on the CPC-DSA connection, see www.chapter19.us.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Do we spend enough on education?


Imagine that you are back in 1970 and listening to the U.S. Secretary of Education (that position did not exist in 1970--the word "education" does not appear at all in the U.S. Constitution) speak about the amount of money invested in education. "This country will commit to doubling the total expenditure per pupil in public elementary and secondary schools by the year 2010.” she says. “And when I say double, I mean in dollars adjusted for inflation."

If you heard that, what would you think? The secretary set an unattainable goal? If such a goal were reached, there would more than enough money for public schools? Even if that goal were reached, it would not be enough money?

Fortunately, the National Center for Education Statistics, which is located within the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences, keeps records on education spending, so we can check out the real figures concerning our fictitious Secretary of Education’s goal. During the 1970-71 school year, the total expenditure per pupil in public elementary and secondary schools was $1,049. If we adjust for inflation, that $1,049 was the equivalent of $5,823 in 2010. If we were to make the Secretary of Education’s goal for the 2010-11 school year, the total expenditure per pupil in public elementary and secondary schools for that year would have to have been $11,646. Did we make it? Not quite, but we were very close. The actual total expenditure per pupil in 2010-11 was $11,153. 

After nearly doubling the total expenditure per pupil since 1970, it would be reasonable to expect that our students are now performing at a higher level than their counterparts during the early 1970s. Unfortunately, that is not the case. “The long-term trend data for the National Assessment of Educational Progress was released today and the news is not good for students in high school,” Education Week reported on April 28, 2009. “Average scores have remained flat for 17-year-olds both in reading and math since the early 1970s, when the assessments were first given.”

In other words, we have nearly doubled our spending on education since 1970, yet we have received absolutely no gain from that investment.

I was thinking of this situation after Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, members of the Kansas National Education Association, and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Paul Davis showed up for a protest in Topeka on May 17. "We must fund our public schools, and we must give children the ladder of education and economic opportunity," said Weingarten. Last year, CBS News quoted Weingarten as saying, “When people talk about other countries out-educating the United States, it needs to be remembered that those other nations are out-investing us in education as well.”

As you can see from the chart on this page, it is true that students in other countries are outperforming our students. However, is it true that those countries are investing more in education than we are? According to the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California, which compared the U.S. to 11 other nations, “The U.S. is the clear leader in total annual spending, but ranks 9th in Science performance and 10th in Math.” The U.S. spends more than twice as per school-aged child than Japan and South Korea, and more than four times as much as Russia.

In a 2009 speech promoting the Affordable Care Act (ACA), President Barack Obama said, “We spend one and a half times more per person on health care than any other country, but we aren't any healthier for it.” That was the Democrats’ rationale for healthcare reform, which, ostensibly, would lower the cost of healthcare per person and make us healthier. Yet when we spend twice as much per student on education than other countries, but our students aren’t any smarter for it, Weingarten, the KNEA, and Davis do not suggest that we need educational reform to lower the costs and improve student performance. Instead, they say that we need to spend even more on education and ignore the performance part of the equation.

Obviously, education will be a major issue in Kansas this year. This issue deserves a reasoned and intelligent discussion amongst candidates for federal and state offices. If Davis and other politicians are going to argue that we need to spend even more on education, it seems to me that they should first assure us that the taxpayers’ money is currently being spent as wisely and effectively as possible.

Monday, May 12, 2014

Peter Hancock portrays left-wing group as a consumer-protection group

In an May 11 article about a possible FBI investigation involving former officials in Gov. Sam Brownback's administration, Lawrence Journal-World reporter/political activist Peter Hancock shared several quotes from Craig Holman of Public Citizen, which Hancock characterized as "a Washington-based group that advocates for consumer protection and campaign finance reform."

This is yet another example of why it is important to look behind the people associated with groups with innocuous-sounding names. We can find Public Citizen's board of directors on its website.

Public Citizen Foundation board members include David Halperin, who "has advised groups including Greenpeace, Democracy for America, Public.Resource.Org, and, in the 1990s, Public Citizen." Democracy for America is listed as an organization that is part of the "Progressive Infrastructure" in Erica Payne's The Practical Progressive: How to Build a Twenty-first Century Political Movement. Halperin was also an adviser to Howard Dean's presidential campaign and a senior vice president of the Center for American Progress, which is also part of the "Progressive Infrastructure."

Cynthia Refro, another foundation board member, was a consultant to the Iraq Peace Fund of the Tides Foundation. Wade Rathke was a founding board member of the Tides Foundation and continues to serve as senior advisor of the San Francisco-based organization. Rathke was also the founder of ACORN.

The Public Citizen, Inc. board includes Barbara Ehrenreich and Jim Hightower, who are both associated with Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Ehrenreich is a DSA honorary chair, while DSA honored Hightower with its Eugene V. Debs Award in 1995. That award, presented annually, is named after the Socialist Party presidential candidate.

Joy Howell, another board member, was the communications director to U.S. Senator Robert Torricelli (D-N.J.).

Obviously, Public Citizen is a far-left organization, yet Hancock presented it as being merely a consumer-protection group.

Friday, May 9, 2014

(Liberal) Women for Kansas

Clockwise from left: Lisa Callahan, Janet Wright, Emira Palacios, Laura Dungan and Wakeelah Martinez
have formed a new political group called Women for Kansas. (April 28, 2014) Mike Hutmacher/ The Wichita Eagle

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/04/3439157/newly-formed-group-urging-women.html#storylink=cpy

The Wichita Eagle had an article in its May 4 edition about a new political group called Women for Kansas. According to the article, Women for Kansas' "initial goal is to defeat Brownback and Secretary of State Kris Kobach at the polls this fall. The group supports Democrats Paul Davis and Jean Schodorf to replace them."

The Eagle presented Women for Kansas as a bipartisan group of women who just got involved in politics because of their concerns with Brownback and Kobach. However, the reporter did not discuss exactly who these women are. It is extremely important for conservatives to look at the people involved with these groups to see who they are and what else they have done in the past. I recognized Emira Palacios name because I wrote about her in my book, Chapter 19: Defeating the Socialist Coalition and Restoring Our Constitutional Republic: 

I did not realize the full extent of the Socialist Coalition’s involvement with the immigration issue until Sunflower Community Action (SCA), a Wichita-based group, bused nearly 300 people to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach’s home on June 15, 2013 to protest his views on illegal immigration. Fortunately, Kobach and his family, which includes four young daughters, were not home when the mob arrived.

I had never heard of SCA before, but after a quick Internet search found that the group is part of National People’s Action (NPA), a Chicago-based community organizing network with affiliates in fourteen states. In fact, Emira Palacios, a coordinator with SCA, also serves as NPA’s vice president and secretary. Palacios came to this country as an illegal immigrant more than twenty-five years ago. (SCA’s executive director, Sulma Arias, was also an illegal immigrant.) 
In the past, NPA has engaged in protests similar to the one at Kobach’s home. For example, in March 2004, NPA protested outside the home of Karl Rove, President George W. Bush’s chief political advisor, to show their support for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or the DREAM Act. “If President Bush wants our [re-election] vote, he has to give us the dream,” Palacios said. According to CNN, “Palacios said Rove agreed to meet with group leaders in his garage but then chastised them for protesting in front of his house and scaring his children.” 
On May 16, 2010, Nina Easton, a Fortune magazine journalist and Fox News contributor, called police around 4:10 p.m. to report that there were at least 500 protesters on her neighbor’s property in Chevy Chase, Maryland. The neighbor, Bank of America executive Greg Baer, was not home at the time. However, his fourteen-year-old son was. Out of fear, he locked himself in a bathroom. The protest was organized by NPA and SEIU. 
A month before the protest at Baer’s home, NPA and SEIU staged a similar protest at the home of JP Morgan Chase executive Peter Scher.

NPA was founded in 1972 by Shel Trapp and Gale Cincotta, Alinskyite community organizers based in Chicago. How far to the left is Palacios' SCA? According to the group’s website, in high school, Louis Goseland, SCA’s director of organizing, “threw himself at any opportunity to organize his fellow students and quickly found himself immersed in the local activist community.” “From an early age, I was exposed to the power of organized people,” Goseland writes. “My mother was a long time member of the Communications Workers of America, my grandmother is a long-time activist for the rights of women, and my father is a radical in every sense of the word.” Democratic Socialists of America has identified Goseland as a DSA member who participated in Occupy Wichita. Two of the three books Goseland recommends SCA's website are Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky and Dynamics of Organizing by Shel Trapp. In June 2013, Goseland’s groups on Facebook included Wichita Democratic Socialists, Occupy Wichita and Kansas, Socialist Party USA, and WSU College Democrats. 

Did the Eagle mention Palacios' leadership roles in the radical SCA and NPA? No. The reporter merely noted that she is "a facilitator at Seed House-Casa de la Semilla in Wichita."

A visit to Women for Kansas' website also turns up some interesting information. As I noted earlier this week, Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger is an honorary chair of the group. She apparently has no problem teaming up with a woman who thought it was all right to demonstrate at the home of a fellow Republican.

Another honorary chair is a Johnson County lawyer named Judith Deedy. Deedy has been in the news lately because she is the executive director of a group called Game On for Kansas SchoolsGame On portrays itself as "a nonpartisan grassroots effort."  However, an inadvertent email exposes that claim as a lie. That email demonstrated that Game On is taking direction from the Davis gubernatorial campaign. Deedy is also a member of the Mainstream Coalition. Despite its name, the Mainstream Coalition is far from mainstream. I wrote a report on the group 15 years ago, which you can read here.

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out the game plan here. Groups with innocuous-sounding names are preparing to form a coalition to defeat Brownback and Kobach this fall. These groups will all be closely aligned with the Davis and Schodorf campaigns, but will be portrayed as grass-roots efforts by those in the media who are ignorant and/or complicit. Sandy Praeger will assist these groups as a prominent Republican in the state to give the groups bipartisan cover. Note that Praeger is also part of an anti-Brownback group called Reroute the Roadmap. Two other Republican women, Rochelle Chronister and Sheila Frahm, also founded this group. Like Praeger, Chronister and Frahm, who lost to Brownback in the 1996 GOP primary election for the seat vacated by Bob Dole, are honorary chairs of Women for Kansas. Three Democrat women, Joan Wagnon, Laura Kelly, and Jill Docking, also founded Reroute the Roadmap. Docking, of course, is Paul Davis' running mate.

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/04/3439157/newly-formed-group-urging-women.html#storylink=cpy
   

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/04/3439157/newly-formed-group-urging-women.html#storylink=cpy

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Hoeflich's Hokum




It was the part of America which had always been most “radical”— that indefinite word, which probably means “most critical of piracy.” - Sinclair Lewis, It Can't Happen Here


Lawrence Journal-World columnist Mike Hoeflich has an opinion piece today entitled "Something's wrong in Kansas." Hoeflich is not happy with the direction Governor Sam Brownback and his fellow "radical" Republicans are taking Kansas, and he wants readers to know that he is darn angry about it. Unfortunately, angry people often make ridiculous comments because their emotions overpower their thinking.

After noting that he is angry, Hoeflich writes, "The lives and welfare of Kansans depend upon the actions of the Legislature." Think about that. Hoeflich believes that your life and your welfare depend on the actions of 125 part-time legislators in Topeka. Apparently, Hoeflich believes the legislature controls our lives. "Control," after all, is defined as "the power to influence or direct people's behavior or the course of events." Of course, the more money governments have, the more power they have to exercise this control. This could very well explain why Hoeflich is so angry that "Revenues in April fell substantially from those that had been projected."

Hoeflich also offered the obligatory, left-winger's nod to former Senator Bob Dole. "Senator Dole was known for his willingness and ability to make compromises 'across the aisle' in order to ensure that government did its job of serving the people," Hoeflich writes. Of course, Dole did most of that compromising while he was a member of the minority in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Also, note that Dole compromised our way to a multi-trillion-dollar national debt. Dole's compromises were much like a compromise between water and arsenic.

Hoeflich then went on to criticize ideology. "Ideology has replaced politics," he writes. "Ideology has replaced sound economic and fiscal policy. Ideology has replaced common sense."

Left-wingers have this odd belief that those with differing points of view are ideological, while they are pragmatists with common sense. David Axelrod made this claim regarding Barack Obama in 2009. "I think President Obama is a committed, practicing nonideologue," Axelrod said. "He's consumed neither tactics nor ideology. He is more concerned about outcomes than he is about process and categorizations." Of course, this is the same Obama who during the 2008 primaries said he would not lower the capital-gains rate even though that would raise more revenues because it wouldn't be "fair." That is what an ideologue would say.

Of course, we all have an ideology, which, after all, is merely "a system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy." Some of us are conservatives, constitutionalists, and libertarians, while others are liberals, progressives, socialists, and even liberal fascists. Without the ideas and ideals that make up an ideology, you would have politics replacing ideology. We saw an example of this when Dole ran for president in 1996. While speaking at a campaign event, Dole said, "I'll be anything you want me to be; I'll be Ronald Reagan if that's what you want."

Of course, Dole could never be Ronald Reagan. Reagan was a strong leader with a conservative ideology; Dole was merely a politician with no ideas or ideals.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Co-editors of LHS newspaper discuss "adverse effects" of "Courageous Conversations"




I have discussed USD 497's no-bid contract with the Pacific Educational Group's "Courageous Conversations" in earlier posts. In the latest issue of The Budget, LHS's newspaper, the co-editors also take on PEG and "Courageous Conversations":


In an effort to bridge the gap, the district allots a great sum of money to the Pacific Educational Group to instruct teachers regarding how to have “Courageous Conversations” about race. The goal of this program is to create equality and discuss racial disparities, but it has proven to have adverse effects.
One of the most difficult issues with this program is how it is being handled. Most teachers aren’t recieving [sic] significant training. Instead of teachers volunteering their time to participate in these workshops, teachers must find substitute teachers for the days they attend. However, there isn’t a large enough budget and there aren’t enough substitutes for all of the teachers to be able to go.
Additionally, white students are not given the opportunity to get involved in these conversations. Students of color, however, are invited to attend leadership symposiums with individuals of their respective race.

These LHS students see that it is wrong to treat students of different races differently. Why can't the radicals on the Lawrence School Board see the same thing and stop wasting our tax dollars on this Marxist and racist program?

Monday, May 5, 2014

Sandy Praeger prepares to betray her party


The Wichita Eagle reported over the weekend that a new group, Women for Kansas (I'll have more about the radical leaders of this group in a future post), has formed to work towards the defeat of Governor Sam Brownback and Secretary of State Kris Kobach, both Republicans, this November.

Interestingly, the Women for Kansas website lists Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, also a Republican, as an honorary co-chair.

Praeger has run as a Republican during her entire political career, has benefited from the votes of Republicans, and endorsed Brownback for governor in 2010. Praeger herself was on the ballot in 2010 to seek her third four-year term as insurance commissioner. She is not seeking re-election this November.

I usually vote for Republicans, but have never voted for Praeger for one simple reason: She is a very dishonest person.

In April 1997, then-State Sen. Sandy Praeger visited Eudora High School and made the following statement:

"Many people think they ought to be able to carry a gun for protection. Statistics show that the national crime rate is on the decline, while accidents related to guns, particularly those involving children, have increased."

(Source: Vickie Hull, "Senator Praeger talks to EHS government classes," The Eudora News, April 24, 1997. p. 1.)

Praeger lied to those students. According to the National Safety Council, there were 64 percent fewer fatal firearm accidents among children in 1995 than in 1975. In addition, the National Center for Health Statistics reported in 1994 that fatal firearms accidents fell to the lowest annual number since record-keeping began in 1903.

At the time Praeger lied to these students, it was true that the national crime rate was on the decline. However, the crime rate was on the increase in Kansas, which had not yet allowed the right to carry. I asked Praeger this question at a Chamber of Commerce "Eggs and Issues" breakfast on April 26, 1997:

"During the years following Florida's enactment of the right to carry in 1987, that state experienced a significant decline in violent-crime rates. During the same years, the Koch Crime Commission reported that Kansas experienced a significant increase in violent-crime rates. How do you explain this?"

Praeger's response? "Statistics can be used to show anything." She then went on to cite statistics concerning the national crime rate and accidental death rates, including the lie she told the students.

Why do I bring up Praeger's lie from 17 years ago? Because Praeger has never been shy about lying to advance her agenda during her entire political career. Keep this in mind as she teams up with Paul Davis in his quixotic quest to unseat Sam Brownback.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Common sense or nonsense?



In 2012, a group of former Republican legislators announced they had formed Traditional Republicans for Common Sense. According to the group’s website, “Radical elements and extremist politicians may have taken over our process, but it’s not too late to take it back from them.”

Founding members of Traditional Republicans for Common Sense include former U.S. Sen. Sheila Frahm, former U.S. Rep. Jan Meyers, former State Sen. Dick Bond, and others who have not stood for election since the last century. It might be unfair to call these politicians “has-beens,” but there is an “All right, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up” feel to the group.

At least one member of Traditional Republicans for Common Sense, former State Sen. Jean Schodorf, isn’t even a Republican. She switched to the Democratic Party shortly after garnering just 41% of the vote in the 2012 Republican primary. “It seems that the Democrats are creating jobs and solving the problems of the debt and keeping our nation solvent,” Schodorf told The Huffington Post, a liberal website, after her switch. Given that the national unemployment rate is still near 7% (it’s under 5% in Kansas) and the national debt has grown by nearly $7 trillion with a Democrat in the White House, some may take issue with Schodorf’s claim that she is for “common sense.”

Former State Sen. Wint Winter, Jr. of Lawrence is also a member of Traditional Republicans for Common Sense. Winter, last elected to office in 1990, has opposed conservative Republicans for many years. For example, in November 1998 Winter and other “moderate” Republicans backed Craig Templeton over Jim Mullins, a conservative, in the election for chairman of the Douglas County Republican Party. U.S. Rep. Vince Snowbarger had just lost to Democrat Dennis Moore, leading one “moderate” to accuse Mullins of “sitting on his hands” prior to the election. Interestingly, just a few months before the chairmanship election, Templeton was the president of the short-lived Douglas County chapter of the Mainstream Coalition, a liberal organization founded by Rev. Robert Meneilly in Johnson County in 1994. The coalition’s political action committee, MAIN*PAC, actually mailed 67,000 postcards in opposition to Snowbarger’s reelection in 1998.   

Is it possible that Winter was unaware of the Mainstream Coalition’s opposition to Snowbarger? Not likely. Winter’s brother, Dan, was on the Mainstream Coalition’s board of directors at the time. MAIN*PAC did its banking with Johnson County Bank, where Dan was the CEO and president.

With the Democrat Dennis Moore replacing the Republican Vince Snowbarger, did the residents of the Kansas 3rd District yet again have a moderate representing them in Washington, D.C.? Not quite. After Moore’s first year in Congress, Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), “America's oldest independent liberal lobbying organization,” named Moore a “Liberal Hero” for voting 100% with ADA on their selected issues. Only 36 of 435 House members received this “honor” in 1999. Moore was a member of the ostensibly conservative Blue Dog Democrats, but he voted as if he were a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Several Traditional Republicans for Common Sense members, including Dick Bond, Tim Emert, Audrey Langworthy, Jim Lowther, Jan Meyers, and Gary Sherrer, were also on the board of directors of  Kansas Traditional Republican Majority’s (KTRM) political action committee. Four days before the 2008 Republican primary election, KTRM sent out a press release with the headline “Kline and Ryun Unmasked: Linked to Ku Klux Klan.” Phill Kline was a candidate for Johnson County district attorney, while Ryun was running to retake the U.S. House seat that he lost in 2006.

How exactly did KTRM link Kline and Ryun to the KKK? In 1996, Tony Perkins, a former Marine and police officer who also worked with the U.S. State Department's Anti-Terrorism Assistance Program, was the manager the of Republican Woody Jenkins’ U.S. Senate campaign in Louisiana. Jenkins’ campaign hired Impact Media to make pre-recorded phone calls for the campaign. In 1999, a federal investigation found that David Duke, who left the KKK in 1980, had a financial interest in Impact Media, which he did not disclose to the IRS. Perkins, who was unaware of Duke’s connection to Impact Media until three years after the Jenkins campaign, became president of the Family Research Council in 2003. Family Research Council Action (FRCA) endorsed Ryun in 2008, while Kline appeared at FRCA’s Blogs for Life Conference that same year. How many degrees of separation is that?

What KTRM failed to disclose is that Andy Wollen, the chair of KTRM’s political action committee, has links to a domestic terrorist group and cop killers. Wollen studied at the Teachers College at Columbia University. This is the institution where former community organizers Bill Ayers and Kathy Boudin earned their doctorate degrees. However, before attending the Teachers College, Ayers and Boudin belonged to the Weather Underground, which declared war on the U.S. government and bombed numerous government buildings. Boudin later served 22 years in prison for her role in a 1981 armored car robbery in which a Brinks guard and two police officers were murdered.

Admittedly, it’s ridiculous to link Wollen to the Weather Underground. However, it is no more ridiculous than linking Kline and Ryun to the KKK. KTRM used this despicable tactic against fellow Republicans, yet it is very unlikely that they or Traditional Republicans for Common Sense would ever say anything as vile concerning a Democrat. In fact, the later group appears to be moving in the direction of supporting an extremely liberal Democrat, Paul Davis of Lawrence,  for governor. For a group that boasts of having “over 700 years of collective service to Kansas,” isn’t it odd that Traditional Republicans for Common Sense seems unwilling and/or unable to enlist one of its own members to challenge Governor Sam Brownback in the Republican primary election in August? 

Saturday, May 3, 2014

When Critical Race Theory Turns Deadly

An Open Letter to Lawrence and Topeka School Board Members:





You’ve heard of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman. However, it is unlikely that you have heard of Nkosi Thandiwe, Brittany Watts, Tiffany Ferenczy, or Lauren Garcia.

Just eight months before Zimmerman shot and killed Martin, Thandiwe, a 21-year-old black man, shot and killed Watts, stole her car, and ran over her body. He later shot Ferenczy and Garcia, who was left paralyzed. Why did Thandiwe shoot three white women?

"In terms of slavery and race, it was something that needed to be answered for,” Thandiwe said during his trial. “I saw it as something that the black community hasn't recovered from so my initial way to handle that was to spread information to help combat some of the ignorance that was in the black community about our history.”

Thandiwe, a recent graduate of the University of West Georgia with a degree in anthropology and a minor in history, also said his history studies changed his thoughts about how some white people treated black people.

Of course, Watts, Ferenczy, and Garcia had never owned slaves, and Thandiwe had never been a slave. In fact, given that his mother is an attorney, it appears that he came from a relatively well-to-do background.

The Thandiwe case never made the national headlines, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton never held rallies for Brittany Watts, and President Obama never said that if he had a son he would look like Nkosi Thandiwe. The case came and went with very little notice. However, I would urge school board members and administrators of USD 497 and USD 501 to give the case some consideration.

Thandiwe said that he was motivated to shoot three white women because he learned about how some white people treated black people in his history studies. "In terms of slavery and race, it was something that needed to be answered for,” he said in an attempt to justify the shootings.

Given that you have spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayers’ dollars on no-bid contracts with Pacific Educational Group (PEG) to promote “critical race theory” in your schools, I hope that you have taken the time to read Courageous Conversations About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools by PEG founder Glenn E. Singleton and Curtis Linton. The contents of this book appear to be little different from Thandiwe’s history studies. Here is Julian Weissplass explaining one of the reasons why racism persists in the United States: “White people lack information about the history and nature of the oppression that people of color have endured. They learn little, for example, about the genocide of indigenous people, the kidnappings and slavery of Africans and the oppression of their descendants, the military seizure of the Southwestern U.S. territory from Mexico, or the imprisonment of Japanese Americans during World War II. The media promote stereotypes and neglect peoples’ real lives. Given the lack of information and the spread of misinformation, it is not surprising that white people do not always understand the feelings of Native Americans, African Americans, Mexican Americans, or Asian Americans.”

What Weissplass wrote in true. However, he and other multiculturalists fail to tell the other side of history. “Whatever the particular crimes of Europe, that continent is also the source—the unique source—of those liberating ideas of individual liberty, political democracy, the rule of law, human rights, and cultural freedom that constitute our previous legacy and to which most of the world today aspires,” liberal historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. wrote in The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society (1991). “These are European ideas, not Asian, nor African, nor Middle Eastern ideas, except by adoption.” Further, “The West needs no lectures on the superior virtue of those ‘sun people’ who sustained slavery until Western imperialism abolished it (and, it is reported, sustain it to this day in Mauritania and the Sudan)....”

While Weissplass decries the promotion of stereotypes in the media, Courageous Conversations doesn’t shy away from stereotypes, although they claim they are “patterns” instead of “stereotypes.” “From the work of Elise Trumbull, Carrie Rothstein-Fisch, Patricia M. Greenfield, and Blanca Quiroz (2000), we have learned that White culture is characterized by individualism whereas cultures of color are more often characterized by collectivism,” Singleton and Linton write. “White Individualism” supposedly fosters independence and individual achievement, promotes self-expression, individual thinking, and personal choice, understands the physical world as knowable apart from its meaning for human life, is associated with egalitarian relationships and flexibility in roles (e.g., upward mobility), and is associated with private property, individual ownership.

Meanwhile, “Color Group Collectivism” fosters interdependence and group success, promotes adherence to norms, respect for authority/elders, and group consensus, understands the physical world in the context of its meaning for human life, is associated with stable, hierarchical roles, and is associated with shared property, group ownership.

As you can see, in Singleton and Linton’s world, White culture and cultures of color are very, very different. They reject Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream of a colorblind society, and instead promote “color-vision,” i.e., which emphasizes our racial differences.

“To make a human hive, you want to make everyone feel like a family,” wrote psychologist Jonathan Haidt in The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (2012). “So don’t call attention to racial and ethnic differences; make them less relevant by ramping up similarity and celebrating the group’s shared values and common identity.” According to Haidt, “Emphasizing differences makes many people more racist, not less.”

I experienced a “human hive” while serving in the Marines. While in boot camp, Staff Sergeant L. K. White, a black man, was the senior drill instructor of our platoon. He, along with Sergeant J. Black (ironically, a white man) and Sergeant F. J. Childs, III, was responsible for taking 75 recruits (which had dwindled down to 41 at the time of graduation) and molding us into Marines. Like every other platoon, ours was racially mixed, with whites, blacks, Hispanics, an Asian, and a Native American. However, White instructed us to put aside our racial differences. “There are no white Marines,” he said. “There are no black Marines. There are only green Marines.” By “green,” he was referring to the color of our uniforms. For three months, we ate together, marched together, did PT (physical training) together, and slept together in a large squad bay. We also had to use the “head” (bathroom) and shower together. There were no doors on the toilet stalls and no shower curtains, so privacy was out of the question. After three months of living like that, you learn to trust and rely on others regardless of their race. You also become a close-knit family with shared values and a common identity.

I believe the Marines’ approach concerning race is far superior to Singleton and Linton’s. It’s also far less likely to produce another Nkosi Thandiwe.


Is Weather Underground agenda now part of USD 497 curriculum?

"We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution." - Bill Ayers, Weather Underground leader, in a 2006 speech at the World Economic Forum in Caracas, Venezuela

"John Dewey suggested that schools must be the engine of social transformation." - Glenn E. Singleton and Curtis Linton, Courageous Conversations About Race (2006)

"Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." - Vladimir Lenin


Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dorhn


In their 1974 political manifesto, Prairie Fire, leaders of the Weather Underground, a communist terrorist organization, wrote, "We believe that radical teachers should work in schools in working class neighborhoods, in community or junior colleges. Radicalize other teachers, organize the parents, teach and encourage your students."

Bill Ayers was among those signing for the Weather Underground at the end of the introduction of Prairie Fire. His opinion about radicalizing teachers was unchanged four decades after the publication of Prairie Fire. "Revolutionaries want to change the world, of course, and teachers, it turns out, want to change the world too—typically one child at a time," he wrote in Public Enemy: Confessions of an American Dissident (2013). "It wasn’t as much of a reach as you might imagine."

While the McCain-Palin campaign briefly (and ineptly) focused on Ayers’ days as a domestic terrorist, it failed to discuss Ayers’ work in education during the past several decades. Ayers earned an Ed.D. from Columbia University’s Teachers College, which was founded by Dr. John Dewey. For Ayers, attending the Teachers College was probably a natural choice. Dewey was active in the League for Industrial Democracy (LID), while Ayers was a community organizer with Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) during the 1960s. SDS developed from the Student League for Industrial Democracy, the youth branch of LID. LID, which descended from the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, was founded in 1905 by notable socialists Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Clarence Darrow, and Norman Thomas.

Ayers became a vice-president of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2008. In addition, Ayers’ younger brother and fellow communist, Rick, serves as the co-president of the National Association of Multicultural Educators (NAME). Conveniently, Bill was on the co-president nomination team.

AERA’s president in 2005-06, Gloria Ladson-Billings, a professor in curriculum and instruction at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was a keynote speaker at the Pacific Educational Group’s (PEG) Summit for Courageous Conversation in 2009. Another keynote speaker at that summit, Antonia Darder, was also a keynote speaker at a NAME event in 2011. Her speech was entitled "The Neoliberal Restructuring of Cities, Education Policy, and Possibilities for Social Transformation Through a Marxist Lens."

In 2008, both Ladson-Billings and Darder signed a statement that read, "We write to support our colleague Professor William Ayers, Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who is currently under determined and sustained political attack." Lisa Delpit and Sonia Nieto, featured speakers at PEG’s Summit for Courageous Conversation in 2013, also signed the statement.

Last month I noted that the Lawrence school district spent $10,200 on a two-day program presented by PEG’s Leidene King. The program, "Beyond Diversity: An Introduction to Courageous Conversations and a Foundation for Deinstitutionalizing Racism and Eliminating Racial Achievement Disparities" is based on a book, Courageous Conversations About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools, by Glenn E. Singleton, PEG’s CEO, and Curtis Linton, and is rooted in a discipline known as Critical Race Theory (CRT). In addition to writing the foreword for Singleton and Linton’s book, Ladson-Billings wrote the foreword for Ayers’ To Teach: The Journey of a Teacher (2001), and co-edited City Kids, City Schools: More Reports from the Front Row (2008) with Ayers.

Unfortunately, PEG’s involvement with the Lawrence school district is much more extensive than I noted last month. Lawrence district and school administrators actually began using Singleton and Linton’s book as a study guide in 2005. A group of administrators, teachers, and community members attended the aforementioned Summit for Courageous Conversation in 2009. In 2012, a group of administrators and teachers attended the PEG summit and received the Summit Leadership Award. Rick Doll, Lawrence Public Schools superintendent, and Angelique Kobler, director of curriculum and instruction, were presenters at the 2013 summit.

According to a May 4, 2013 Lawrence Journal-World article, a PEG consultant asked Lawrence school board members and a handful of administrators what they thought "whiteness as property" means. That phrase comes from the title of a 1993 Harvard Law Review article by Cheryl I. Harris.* In 2000 Harris served on the Coordinating Committee of the Black Radical Congress (BRC). According to BRC leaders in a June 15, 1998 email, "It seemed to us the idea of bringing together the varied sections of the Black radical tradition—Socialists and Communists, revolutionary nationalists, and radical Black feminists and womanists—was long overdue."

Is it possible that Lawrence school board members were unaware of the fact that the major progenitors and proponents of CRT—including Harris, Ayers, Cornel West, and the late Derrick Bell—are almost exclusively Marxists?

Of course, one might overlook the Marxist nature of CRT if PEG showed signs of progress. Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be the case. After paying PEG more than $850,000 over three years, the achievement gap between white and black students in St. Paul, Minn., remained unchanged. The achievement gap in math between white and Hispanic students actually widened. The Rochester (Minn.) School District spent approximately $238,000 with the PEG over a five-year period. Again, there was no evidence that the achievement gap between white and minority students narrowed.

At times, PEG even appears uninterested in demonstrating progress. "[PEG] could do better providing good reports on progress they’ve made," said Christine Stead, trustee of the Ann Arbor, Mich., school board in 2011. "You should never have a board be completely surprised at your findings and should be able to demonstrate your findings in some way that’s measurable. We’re not getting that from them." After a seven-year relationship with PEG, Ann Arbor Public Schools declined to renew its contract in 2012.

Between July 2010 and June 2012, USD 497 spent more than $225,000 with PEG for contracts, books, travel, summits, and other expenses. USD 497 also paid $79,700 to PEG as part of a no-bid contract during the 2013-14 school year. In addition, district costs for conference registrations and hotel accommodations at the PEG summit in St. Louis in October 2013 were approximately $15,607. That’s well over $300,000 spent on a program that is based on a controversial Marxist theory. Do the taxpayers really want to spend additional dollars on a dubious and, frankly, racist program, especially at a time when school districts throughout Kansas are saying they’re underfunded?

By the way, if you live in Topeka and believe only those crazy liberals in Lawrence would get involved with something as far out as CRT, think again. According to the February 2014 issue of Topeka Public Schools’ newsletter, "Three years ago our district and building leaders began to explore how race might be negatively impacting our student achievement levels. In order to have conversations about race, we needed guidance. We decided to solicit help and advice from Mr. Glenn Singleton with the Pacific Education [sic] Group."
----------------------------------------------------
* UPDATE: The Journal-World's Peter Hancock wrote that the phrase "whiteness as property" comes from the title of a 1993 Harvard Law Review article by Cheryl I. Harris. I have since found an earlier reference to this phrase from the late Prof. Derrick Bell of Harvard University. Bell, you may remember, was Barack Obama's professor at Harvard Law School.

USD 497 Spends $10,300 to Promote Marxist Theory

The February 2, 2014 issue of the Lawrence Journal-World included an article about Leidene King of the Pacific Educational Group (PEG) presenting a two-day program entitled “Beyond Diversity: An Introduction to Courageous Conversations and a Foundation for Deinstitutionalizing Racism and Eliminating Racial Achievement Disparities.” According to the article, “dozens of teachers, administrators and other people connected to the Lawrence school district.”

“Courageous Conversations” is based on a book by Glenn E. Singleton, PEG CEO, and Curtis Linton. The program is rooted in a discipline known as Critical Race Theory (CRT). What is CRT? The UCLA School of Public Affairs answers this question:

CRT recognizes that racism is engrained in the fabric and system of the American society. The individual racist need not exist to note that institutional racism is pervasive in the dominant culture. This is the analytical lens that CRT uses in examining existing power structures. CRT identifies that these power structures are based on white privilege and white supremacy, which perpetuates the marginalization of people of color. CRT also rejects the traditions of liberalism and meritocracy. Legal discourse says that the law is neutral and colorblind, however, CRT challenges this legal “truth” by examining liberalism and meritocracy as a vehicle for self-interest, power, and privilege.

According to Robert Holland of the Lexington Institute, CRT “is a radical academic doctrine that gained currency in elite U.S. law schools in the 1980s and 1990s, and has more recently taken hold with multiculturalism advocates in teacher-training instructions.” “One of the progenitors of CRT, the late Derrick Bell, aHarvard University law professor, berated liberal civil-rights scholars for their championship of a colorblind society,” Holland continued. “Like many of his allies, he relied largely on narrative and anecdote to advance his arguments, and argued for sweeping societal transformation generated more by political organizing than rights-based legal remedies.”

Interestingly, Bell was one of Barack Obama’s law professors at Harvard. When Obama was later a lecturer (not a professor) at the University of Chicago Law School, one of the courses he taught was a seminar entitled “Current Issues in Racism and Law.” Bell was one of the writers Obama required his students to read. In an interview prior to his death, Bell discussed the Marxist foundation of CRT. As of 2009, Bell served as a sponsor of New Politics, a magazine almost completely staffed and run by members of Democratic Socialists of America.

In 2009, PEG’s Singleton was the plenary speaker at the Summit for Courageous Conversation in Baltimore. Other speakers at the summit included keynote speakers Gloria Ladson-Billings and Antonia Darder.

Ladson-Billings was the president of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2005-06. In 2008, a gentleman named Bill Ayers was elected to serve as an AERA vice-president. That’s the same Bill Ayers who was a domestic terrorist with the communist Weather Underground during the 1970s and befriended Obama during the 1990s. In 2012, Dr. Nelly Ukpokodu of LawrenceKan., was elected co-chair of Critical Educators for Social Justice, which is a special interest group of AERA. Ukpokodu is a disciple of Paulo Freire, the Brazilian Marxist who is best known for his influential work, “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.”

Darder is a Professor of Educational Policy Studies and Latino/a Studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and the author of “Culture and Power in the Classroom, Reinventing Paulo Freire: A Pedagogy of Love.” Darder actually worked and studied with Freire.

Darder was also a keynote speaker at a National Association of Multicultural Educators (NAME) event in New OrleansUkpokodu currently serves as chair of NAME’s International Connections Committee, while an Ayers serves as NAME’s co-president. This Ayers is Rick, Bill’s younger brother. Conveniently, Bill was on the co-president nomination team.

So how much did USD 497 spend on this two-day program? $10,300. Does USD 497 really believe the taxpayers want to spend that much to promote a Marxist theory?